This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Contact Us   |   Print Page   |   Sign In
Community Search
News & Press: Supreme Court of Kentucky

Chief Justice Minton updates legislature about Judicial Branch's response to COVID-19

Friday, June 5, 2020  

For Immediate Release

Contact: Leigh Anne Hiatt, APR, Public Information Officer, Administrative Office of the Courts, Phone 502-573-2350, lhiatt@kycourts.net


Chief Justice Minton updates legislature about Judicial Branch’s response to COVID-19

 

FRANKFORT, Ky., June 4, 2020 — Chief Justice of Kentucky John D. Minton Jr. gave the legislature an update today on how the Judicial Branch has responded to the COVID-19 public health crisis.

 

He spoke remotely before the Interim Joint Committee on Judiciary, which met at the Capitol Annex in Frankfort. His remarks can be found here.

 

He began by addressing the racism and injustice that continue to oppress here in the commonwealth and across the country. “The court system and the legal profession must continue to advocate for a diverse bench and bar to reflect the communities that we serve,” Chief Justice Minton said. “The Kentucky Court of Justice is committed to hearing your cries for justice and working to eradicate the racial and ethnic disparities within our system."

 

He then described how the court system took unprecedented measures in the wake of the pandemic, including limiting in-person proceedings; encouraging judges to use audio/video technology to conduct hearings; postponing all civil trials, hearings and motions; and suspending new juror orientations.

 

In conjunction with the Supreme Court’s overarching emergency order, additional administrative orders addressed staffing in the Offices of Circuit Court Clerk, existing custody and parenting time orders, continuing legal education deadlines, appellate filing deadlines and the emergency release of individuals arrested for certain offenses.

 

“While in-person services were limited at court facilities during much of April and May, our courts were never closed,” he said. “Judges, clerks and court staff stayed busy behind the scenes, processing filings and payments, taking phone calls from the public, rescheduling future court dates, navigating a new world of remote court proceedings and preparing for the eventual resumption of in-person services.” 

 

He created three task forces to work with judges and circuit clerks on a reopening plan that began June 1 on a phased basis.

“I am grateful to Deputy Chief Justice Lisabeth T. Hughes, chair of the Circuit Court Task Force; Justice Debra Hembree Lambert, chair of the Family Court Task Force; and Justice Michelle M. Keller, chair of the District Court Task Force, for their leadership in guiding their respective committees. The feedback we received from the judges and clerks on the task forces helped shape the court’s guidance and directives.”

 

The reopening plan was based on two Supreme Court orders that provide guidance on the expansion of court operations: a general order relating to the health and safety requirements for expanding court operations and a more specific order with guidance on certain case types.

 

Chief Justice Minton said that strict standards for health and safety were paramount in the planning. “One of our guiding principles was the involuntary nature of most court proceedings. People can choose whether to eat at a restaurant or go shopping, but in most instances they don’t get to choose whether they go to court. I think we have, for the most part, struck a delicate balance between addressing our constitutional obligations to hear pending matters while also protecting the health of court staff and the public.”

 

The pandemic response has allowed the courts to reconsider how they do business, which will ultimately improve the efficiency of the services they provide.

 

“Some of the processes that have been adopted, like the use of phone and video conferences for routine hearings and motion hours, have been discussed by the Civil Justice Reform Commission as a best practice for civil dockets,” he said. “And we have quickly realized the economic benefits and efficiencies of using remote technology in criminal matters, especially in cases where inmates otherwise would have been transported from another county to attend an in-person hearing.”

 

Chief Justice Minton said the pandemic has also highlighted the need to focus on electronic filing as the standard rather than the exception. ”The ability to submit court filings from your desk allows the work of lawyers and courts to continue regardless of whether the courthouse doors are open.”


He said that one of the most beneficial unintended consequences of the pandemic has been the decrease in the pretrial jail populations. “On March 20, I asked judges to work with jailers and other county officials to responsibly release as many inmates as possible as quickly as possible to avoid the potential for a devastating outbreak,” Chief Justice Minton said. “I am proud of how swiftly our criminal justice partners – judges, jailers, prosecutors and defenders – worked together to safely release low-risk defendants.

 

The Department of Family & Juvenile Services has successfully used virtual platforms for diversion programs, screenings, assessments, telehealth services and ongoing case monitoring that links young people to resources necessary for their success. 

 

In addition, the Department of Specialty Courts quickly transitioned to an online format to serve the more than 2,000 Drug Court, Mental Health Court and Veterans Treatment Court participants who could not wait for in-person services to resume. Staff began meeting daily with participants by phone or remotely. “Although court was being held differently, we were encouraged to learn that in Kentucky, as well as across the nation, treatment court participants were maintaining their recovery and, in many situations, thriving in this new virtual environment,” he said.

 

Chief Justice Minton closed by saying that the most important lesson he has learned from the pandemic is the incredible resiliency of the judges, circuit clerks and court staff. “It is impossible to completely shift the course of a vessel as large as the Kentucky Court of Justice without hitting some bumps along the way. But I am immensely proud of how quickly our elected officials and employees have adapted to a completely new way of doing business and how willingly they learned and adopted new technologies.

 

Learn more about the Judicial Branch’s response to COVID-19 and the Courts here.

 

Background

The chief justice is the administrative head of the state court system and is responsible for overseeing its operation. Chief Justice Minton was elected to the Supreme Court in 2006. His fellow justices elected him to serve a fourth four-year term as chief justice in 2020. He is a member of the board of directors for the State Justice Institute, a federal nonprofit corporation that awards grants to improve the quality of justice in state courts. He is also a past president of the Conference of Chief Justices and past chair of the National Center for State Courts Board of Directors.

 

The Administrative Office of the Courts in Frankfort is the operations arm of the state court system. The AOC supports the activities of nearly 3,400 court system employees and 406 elected justices, judges and circuit court clerks. As the fiscal agent for the court system, the AOC executes the Judicial Branch budget.


more Calendar

9/1/2020 » 12/31/2020
2020 Kentucky Law Update

Privacy Policy

Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal